Legal Opinion
FIRST NAT. BANK IN HARVEY v. Colonial Bank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 7, 1995No. 92 C 1679PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons explained, plaintiff First National Bank in Harvey’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Colonial Bank’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Check kiting is a form of bank fraud. 1 The kiter opens accounts at two (or more) banks, writes checks on insufficient funds on one account, then covers the overdraft by depositing a check drawn on insufficient funds from the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patricia Babrocky v. Jewel Food Company and Retail Meatcutters Union, Local 320, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- El Camino Resources, Ltd. v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Bank of America, N.A. v. FischerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- State v. SuberOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Citizens Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Frost National Bank v. Midwest Autohaus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.