Legal Opinion
United States v. Goldston
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 12, 2011No. 11-1087Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants David W. Gold-ston and Nancy S. Goldston (collectively “Goldston”), appearing pro se, appeal the judgment of the district court granting the government’s motion to dismiss, filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and dismiss this appeal as moot.
In 1998, the IRS filed notices of federal tax lien to satisfy liability for 1991 taxes on each of two lots (the “Lots”) in Gunnison County, Colorado, originally purchased by Goldston and transferred by him to two separate holding trusts.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stump v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Piper Aircraft Distribution System Antitrust Litigation. Van-S-Aviation Corporation v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Smith v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.