Legal Opinion

Davis v. Federal Election Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 2008No. 07-320PublishedCited by 1,175 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

In this appeal, we consider the constitutionality of federal election law provisions that, under certain circumstances, impose different campaign contribution limits on candidates competing for the same congressional seat.

I

A

Federal law limits the amount of money that a candidate for the House of Representatives and the candidate’s authorized committee may receive from an individual, as well as the amount that the candidate’s party may devote to coordinated campaign expenditures. 2 U. S. C. § 441a (2006 ed.). 1 Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,175 opinions

  1. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Carter v. HealthPort Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

1,170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API