Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Herman v. Electrical District No. 2

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1970No. 10092PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Chief Justice:

This case is before us on a petition to review a decision of the Court of Appeals (12 Ariz.App. 222, 469 P.2d 114) reversing a decision of the superior court. Decision of the Court of Appeals vacated, and judgment of the superior court affirmed.

The matter was heard by the court without a jury. The complaint was in eminent domain praying for title to the land needed to widen a public road. Defendant, Electrical District #2 of Pinal County, hereinafter referred to as ED, claimed a vested interest in part of the land to be condemned. It was stipulated that the cost of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Old Pueblo Transit Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sanitary District No. 1 of Pima County v. State Ex Rel. WilleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. State ex rel. Herman v. Electrical District No. 2Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Herman v. CardonArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. SUSSEX RURAL ELEC. COOPERATIVE v. Wantage Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API