Legal Opinion

City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 20, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 This opinion addresses whether Plaintiff City of Chandler (the “City”) is required, as the trial court found, to pay the costs of relocating its utility lines under a roadway that had been dedicated to the public. The City challenges the entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Arizona Department of Transportation (“ADOT”). For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The City owns several water and sewer utility lines under McQueen and Willis Roads in an unincorporated portion of Maricopa County…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Harlingen Irrigation District Cameron County No. 1 v. Caprock Communications Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  5. Minneapolis Gas Co. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. KayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Ross v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. Robinson v. KayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Tms v. ZachariahCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  5. Tms v. ZachariahCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API