Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 16, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 00-0079PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (“Burlington”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the Arizona Corporation Commission (the “Commission”). Burlington’s lawsuit challenged the Commission’s authority to order the establishment of a public railroad crossing where a private road used by the public intersects Burlington’s railroad tracks. We conclude that neither the Arizona Constitution nor the legislature has conferred authority on the Commission to require such a crossing and, therefore, we reverse and remand.

I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woerth v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. FarinaIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rodgers v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass'n v. OrlandiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Grand Canyon Trust v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State v. Gaynor-FonteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API