Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Williams

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1898No. 2,465PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From the Posey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment for alleged personal injuries caused by appellant’s negligence. The error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The only reasons for a new trial which are discussed by counsel are, that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, the giving of certain instructions, and the refusal to give others requested by appellant.

The jury returned a general verdict, and with it answered three interrogatories, which in no sense conflict with the general verdict. It is earnestly argued that on the evidence of appellee herself, she was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StarksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API