Legal Opinion

Schindler v. Wabash R.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided November 9, 1948No. 362PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Several questions have been raised by the parties on the motion to remand in this case. The plaintiff is a resident of Missouri and the corporate defendant. is a non-resident. Two local defendants fictitiously named as John Doe and Richard Roe were joined as defendants.

The averments of the complaint are sufficient to show joint liability. However, the corporate removing defendant alleged that such averments were merely colorable and that there was no intention on the part of plaintiff to endeavor to obtain judgment against said resident defendants. The petition to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Donovan v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Leonard v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Grosso v. Butte Electric Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chacon v. Sperry Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Duff v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Schindler v. Wabash R. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
  4. Herzig v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  5. Lewis v. Producers Cooperative Oil MillDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API