Legal Opinion

Duff v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1968No. Civ. 68-C-20PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Duff, a citizen of Oklahoma, is the insured under a policy of insurance issued by Defendant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a Connecticut corporation with its principal place of business at Hartford, Connecticut. Suit was brought in the Creek County District Court and service on the Defendant Aetna was completed in the manner prescribed by Oklahoma statute (36 Oklahoma Statutes § 621). Defendant Smith has never been served and it does not appear that summons was ever issued as to him as is required by 12 O.S. § 151. 1 Defendant Aetna has filed a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Stamm v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  3. Rick v. HedrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1958
  4. Robertson v. NyeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Wolsum v. J. W. Bateson Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. VitekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Albert Pecherski v. General Motors Corp. And Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Aydell v. SternsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1988
  4. Armstrong v. Monex International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  5. Workman v. National Supaflu Systems, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API