Chacon v. Sperry Corp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Justice.
Defendants Koch Lumber & Implement Co., Inc., and Sperry Corporation bring this certified appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint, filed after the running of the applicable statute of limitations, substituted defendants’ names in place of two fictitious names contained in the original complaint.
I
Hipólito Chacon’s right foot was injured August 1, 1981, while Chacon was operating a forklift. Chacon filed this action on July 28, 1983, near the end of the two-year limitation period of I.C. §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Sims v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- William E. Bufalino v. The Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Varlack v. SWC Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Katherine Lea StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Durrant v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CannadyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Rohr v. RohrIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.