Legal Opinion

United States v. Santulli

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 17, 1989No. ACMR 8800773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KENNETT, Judge:

Tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members, appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of larceny of military property and wrongful sale of that property (two cameras and a camera lens, total value in excess of $100.00), in violation of Articles 121 and 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 908 (1982), respectively. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to E-l, and a reprimand. The convening authority approved…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. ManceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. MaloneU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AllisonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. MeeksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. WiederkehrU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. CoffmanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  5. United States v. BankstonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API