Legal Opinion
Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A. v. Gene Rechtzigel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 10, 2015No. A14-1499Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1499 Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A., Respondent, vs. Gene Rechtzigel, et al., Appellants. Filed August 10, 2015 Affirmed in part and reversed in part Reyes, Judge Dakota County District Court File No. 19HACV134181 William F. Mohrman, James R. Magnuson, Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Paul C. Peterson, Eric J. Steinhoff, William L. Davidson, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondent)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.