Legal Opinion
Abramson v. City of West Hollywood
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1992No. B059370PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Mayme Abramson appeals from the judgment entered following denial of her petition for a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) challenging a resolution of respondent City of West Hollywood Rent Stabilization Commission (Commission), 1 which denied her application for a rent increase. We find that City calculated Abramson’s gross rental income in an unauthorized manner and therefore reverse.
Background
Abramson is an elderly widow who owns a nine-unit apartment building in West Hollywood. She resides in one of the units. In 1985, the newly created City of West Hollywood…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Cotati Alliance for Better Housing v. City of CotatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Olivos Mobile Home ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Vega v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sandoval v. Los Angeles County Department of Public Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994