Legal Opinion
United States v. Fish
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 27, 1989No. 2:89-cr-80439PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion for application of the enhanced sentencing provisions of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e).
FACTS
The defendant, Michael J. Fish was convicted on September 20, 1989, following a jury trial, of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Prior to trial, the government filed its notice of intent to classify the defendant as an “Armed Career Criminal” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). This section is entitled the Armed Career Criminal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. LangworthyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. William Henry Taylor A/K/A Baldy Briley A/K/A William Briley TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. SandersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Herman E. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael FishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991