United States v. Michael Fish
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant, Michael Fish, appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and the enhancement of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). He argues that the district court, 726 F.Supp. 156, erred by improperly conducting voir dire, denying his motion for judgment of acquittal where the government did not prove an interstate nexus, and enhancing his sentence pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I. Voir Dire
Defendant first contends that the district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scarborough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Herman E. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Wendell BlountCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Lee Erwin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Calvin B. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert Paul KaplanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Theodore A. Tirrell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.