Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Bruner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2001No. 00-5205PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

Diana Bruner, the widow of Daniel Bruner, brought cross-claims against Daniel’s parents in a condemnation action that had been instituted by the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority. 1 Diana’s cross-claims sought to establish her interest in four tracts of land (two of which were subject to the condemnation proceeding, and two of which were not) to which Daniel’s parents held title. The district court entered judgment against Diana, and she appeals.

I

Daniel Bruner, who is now deceased, was the son of Leda and Bim Bruner, both of whom are Creek Indians. Diana Bruner is the widow of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. Samaad v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Gas-A-Car, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. American Petrofina, Inc., and American Petrofina Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Niemi v. LasshoferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. McBeth v. HimesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Jordan v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Stockman's Water Co., LLC v. Vaca Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API