Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Pugh

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2005No. 04-1095PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Bureau of Prisons regulations say inmates may not “act as [a] reporter” or “publish under a byline.” 28 C.F.R. § 540.20(b). Plaintiff Mark Jordan is a federal inmate who was punished for publishing under a byline after he successfully submitted two articles for publication in a magazine. In this lawsuit, Mr. Jordan challenges the BOP regulations on several grounds, including unconstitutional overbreadth and vagueness. The district court granted the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs facial vagueness claim and on the individual defendants’ qualified…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. McBeth v. HimesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Center for Individual Freedom v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Planned Parenthood Southeast Ohio Region v. DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Taylor v. Roswell Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. RodebaughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API