Legal Opinion

Gerlock v. Gabel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, 332PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chirp Justicr Horacr Strrn,

Although a considerable amount of testimony was taken in this case some of the factual background unfortunately remains obscure.

Plaintiff, Mary E. Gerlock, and defendant, Margaret M. Gabel, are mother and daughter. Plaintiff and her husband owned properties numbers 630 and 632 Enola Road, West Pairview, Cumberland County, subject to a mortgage of $2,400 held by one Andrew J. Ryan. In 1920 Ryan foreclosed the mortgage after giving written instructions to his attorney, S. S. Rupp, Esq., to purchase the property at the execution sale and hold it in trust…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. EngardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Davis v. HillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Strut v. HuseltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Gast v. EngelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Jenne v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Barker & Williamson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Brown v. HahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Dzierski EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API