Legal Opinion
IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Barker & Williamson, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 10, 1986No. Nos. 85-5385, 85-5417 and 85-5429PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents a question under federal pension laws and requires us to decide whether the district court properly held that the appellant corporation, Sentinel Electronics, Inc., was a member of a controlled group with Barker & Williamson, Inc. (“B & W”). B & W had ceased operations and defaulted on its payments to a pension fund. The district court held that Sentinel was a member of a controlled group with B & W, and deemed Sentinel to be the employer of B & W’s employees. This determination imposed upon Sentinel liability for B & W’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Goodall-Sanford, Inc. v. United Textile Workers, A. F. L. Local 1802Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 v. Centra, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Burton SlotkyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Baldwin v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Am. Orthopedic & Sports Med. v. Independence Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.