Legal Opinion
Olmanson v. LeSueur County
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 31, 2005No. A03-629PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In this case we are asked to decide whether the 10-year statute of repose provision in Minn.Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a) (2004), applies to claims for negligence based on a landowner’s common-law duty to inspect and maintain the property. The court of appeals held that the claims were not time-barred by the statute. We affirm.
Appellant Shoreland Recreational Cooperative (Shoreland) owns and operates an 18-hole golf course with golf holes on both sides of LeSueur County Road 21. Sometime prior to 1989, Shoreland designed and built a golf cart culvert under County Road 21…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.