Legal Opinion

Delgado v. Lohmar

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1979No. 49636PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Plaintiff landowner, accidentally blinded 1 by a shot fired by one of the party of j defendant grouse hunters on his property 1 without his knowledge or consent, appeals from a judgment of the Aitkin County District Court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The trial court found that, as a matter of law, defendants were not engaged in a joint enterprise and that there were not sufficient facts to submit the case to a jury on the theory of negligence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

To determine whether the trial court erred (1) in deciding as a matter of law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Mathews v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Glen Johnson v. Charps Welding & FabricatingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Bjerke v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API