Delgado v. Lohmar
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Plaintiff landowner, accidentally blinded 1 by a shot fired by one of the party of j defendant grouse hunters on his property 1 without his knowledge or consent, appeals from a judgment of the Aitkin County District Court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The trial court found that, as a matter of law, defendants were not engaged in a joint enterprise and that there were not sufficient facts to submit the case to a jury on the theory of negligence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
To determine whether the trial court erred (1) in deciding as a matter of law…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Mathews v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Glen Johnson v. Charps Welding & FabricatingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Bjerke v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.