Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Dunlap

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1981No. 8118SC25PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The trial court erred in granting the judgment N.O.V., and the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The defendants’ motion for directed verdict and motion for judgment N.O.V. did not state the specific grounds therefor as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a). Both the North Carolina Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals have stated that this requirement is mandatory. Anderson v. Butler, 284 N.C. 723, 202 S.E. 2d 585 (1974), and Wheeler v. Denton, 9 N.C. App. 167, 175 S.E. 2d 769 (1970). But the Supreme Court has stated: “However, the courts need not inflexibly enforce…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Fetner v. Rocky Mount Marble & Granite WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robert Del Raso v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Alston v. MonkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Humphrey v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Fortson v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Hyatt v. Mini Storage on the GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API