Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Sharley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1952No. 31847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

Marvin Hawley, plaintiff, initiated this lawsuit seeking to recover treble damages under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 939 [P.P.C. § 103-5], from L. C. Sharley and George Locke and their respective spouses, defendants, for allegedly cutting and removing timber without authority from a lot owned by Hawley in Pierce county, Washington.

The defendants generally denied the allegation of the complaint. In addition, Locke and wife interposed an affirmative defense based on Rem. Rev. Stat., § 940 [P.P.C. § 103-7], that the trespass, if any, and the cutting of trees was casual, involuntary, and with probable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shumaker v. Charada Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Fobes Supply Co. v. KendrickWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gibson v. ThisiusWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Green v. LangnesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Sigol v. KaplanWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API