Legal Opinion

In re Fahrenholtz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 7, 2017No. 2017-B-0261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

2Per curiam

liThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disci*205plinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, James Louis Fahrenholtz, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana,1 but currently suspended from practice.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY

Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1996.

In 2009, we considered a disciplinary proceeding involving two sets of formal charges against respondent. In the first…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited6 opinions

Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
In re BasileSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
In Re FahrenholtzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

In Re: Janinne Latrell GilbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
In Re: Ronald SeastrunkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
In Re: Ronald SeastrunkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017