Legal Opinion
In Re Fahrenholtz
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 2, 2009No. 2009-B-0748PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM. *
This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, James Louis Fahrenholtz, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.
UNDERLYING FACTS
08-DB-002
Count I
Effective October 31, 2005, respondent was declared ineligible to practice law in Louisiana for failure to pay his bar dues and the disciplinary assessment. Effective July 27, 2006, respondent was declared ineligible to practice law for failure to comply with the mandatory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. BoutallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- In re DonnanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re FahrenholtzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- In Re SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- In re HernandezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- In re FahrenholtzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- In re NguyenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017