In Re: Ronald Seastrunk
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Concurrence · WeimerWeimer, J.
I agree that the respondent has not engaged in misconduct. I write separately from the majority to emphasize that such conclusion is supported by the plain language of Rule 3.8(d) of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct.
As a preliminary, factual matter, the disciplinary board did not manifestly err in finding that the respondent lacked knowledge of Kristyn Hoffpauir's varying accounts of her husband's homicide. Therefore, the only issue remaining is whether respondent committed misconduct by failing to disclose statements concerning Kristyn's possession of a gun.
In resolving this…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Hughes.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In re FahrenholtzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017