Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re: Ronald Seastrunk

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 18, 2017No. 2017-B -0178Published

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #050 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 18th day of October, 2017, are as follows: BY CRICHTON, J.: 2017-B -0178 IN RE: RONALD SEASTRUNK The disclosure obligations found in Rule 3.8(d) of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct and in Brady v. Maryland are coextensive. For this reason, we find ODC failed to meet its burden of proof in this case and dismiss all charges against respondent. JOHNSON, C.J., concurs in result. WEIMER, J., concurs and assigns reasons. HUGHES, J., concurs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API