Legal Opinion

Frandila v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1926No. 19569. Department TwoPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

Gust Frandila was a coal miner, and in June, 1924, was sixty years of age. For eight months prior to June, he had been out of employment, and what work he did during that period was limited to chopping firewood for his home. On the 2nd day of June, he was employed to assist in digging a ditch for a sewer in one of the streets of Hoquiam. He went to work at one o’clock in the afternoon, and, about three hours thereafter, he was noticed by the foreman to stop chopping on a root at the bottom of the ditch, which was then some 4% feet deep, throw away his ax, lean against the ditchside and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Indian Creek Coal & Mining Co. v. CalvertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McCormick Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Williams v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Cole v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Devlin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API