Legal Opinion

Doe v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2002No. 26757PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

NATURE OF THE CASE

John Doe appeals the district court’s decision that affirmed the magistrate court’s decree terminating his parental rights. The magistrate court found that Doe had abandoned and neglected the child and that it was in the child’s best interests to have his parental rights terminated. This decision was affirmed by the district court on appeal.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

At the time the appeal was filed, Doe was serving a prison term in the Idaho State Penitentiary that expired in December, 2000. His sentence included a provision for retained jurisdiction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Rife v. LongIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nicholls v. BlaserIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Dayley v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Walborn v. WalbornIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API