Legal Opinion

Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2015No. 42529PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Jane Doe appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to her son, TSD. Because TSD is an “Indian child” as that term is defined by the Indian Child Welfare Act, the magistrate court was required to make findings in addition to those required by Idaho law. Among other findings, the Department of Health and Welfare (“DHW”) was required to satisfy the court that it made “active efforts” to “prevent the breakup of the Indian family.” On appeal, Doe argues that the magistrate court erred in finding that DHW made such efforts and erred in failing to make that finding by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dashiell v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe (In re Jane Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Jane Doe v. John Doe (In re Jane Doe II)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API