Legal Opinion
Mailey v. Septa
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 2001No. 01-CV-2747PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXPLANATION AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
On July 2, 1999, David Mailey was injured while attempting to use a foot bridge on West Somerset Street in Philadelphia. On April 30, 2001, Mailey filed a complaint against SEPTA, the City of Philadelphia, PECO Energy Co., Draco Investments, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) in state court within the applica*275ble two year statute of limitations which expired on July 2, 2001.1 Amtrak removed this case to federal court on June 4, 2001. On July 26, 2001, the parties met for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- James Wood, Cross v. Allen Worachek, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Richard Worthington, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Dave Wilson and Jeff Wall, and Village of Peoria Heights, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Nelson v. County Of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Advanced Power Systems, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Curry v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alberts v. Gallagher (In re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Hechinger Liquidation Trust v. Cooper Bussmann, Inc. (In Re Hechinger Investment Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Arthur v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003