Legal Opinion
Curry v. Johns-Manville Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 81-0068PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this asbestos case move for leave to amend their complaint, pursuant to *625F.R.C.P. 15(c), to add certain additional defendants 1 on a “relation back” basis, as though they had been sued at the same time that plaintiffs filed their original complaint. These additional defendants are currently involved in the case as third-party defendants, having been joined by one of the original defendants, Pacor, Inc., on a third-party complaint for indemnity or contribution.
Plaintiffs filed their original complaint on January 9, 1981, alleging that Mr. Curry…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harold l.loudenslager v. Margaret Bittinger TeepleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Ratcliffe v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Mitchell v. HendricksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Francis v. Pan American Trinidad Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Patraka v. Armco Steel Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nelson v. County Of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- O'KEEFE v. GrenkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Crossland Savings FSB v. Rockwood InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.