Legal Opinion
Arthur v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 15, 2003No. Civ.A. 02-2931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of plaintiff Edward Arthur (“Arthur”) for reconsideration of this court’s Order of August 12, 2003 in which we dismissed in part his complaint against the defendant, United States of America. The latter has also moved for reconsideration to the extent that our Order denied its motion to dismiss for improper venue.
I
Arthur, a merchant seaman, filed his original complaint pursuant to the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 741 et seq., against his employers Maersk, Inc. (“Maersk”) and Dyn…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Hedges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005