Legal Opinion

Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1984No. 8314SC145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Prior to commencement of this action, plaintiff owned a mechanic and body shop, and defendant State Farm operated a claims adjustment service, in Durham. Defendants Cox and McKinney were employed by defendant State Farm as claims agents.

In February 1980 a dispute arose between plaintiff and defendants over the repair of an automobile. The owner called plaintiff and told him to take the automobile to his shop. Plaintiff did so, and prepared an estimate on the cost of repairs. The automobile was insured by defendant State Farm, however, and it refused to accept the estimate.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Wilson v. McClennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. The IN PORTERS, SA v. Hanes Printables, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  2. Clark v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Morin v. SharpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hartman v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API