Legal Opinion
In RE:TAM en Banc
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 22, 2015No. 2014-1203PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MOORE, in which Chief Judge PROST and Circuit Judges NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL join.
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge. O’MALLEY, in which Circuit Judge WALLACH joins.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge DYK, in which Circuit Judges LOURIE and REYNA join with respect to parts I, II, III, and IV.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act bars the Patent and Trademark…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matal v. TamSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- In Re: Erik BrunettiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Lance HimesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.