Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Burkhart

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 13, 2001No. 84,653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

The appellants, Michael L. Burkhart and Kent A. Stehlik, appeal the district court’s order that the county had acquired a portion of their land in Ford County, Kansas, by way of implied dedication.

For simplicity, the appellants will be referred to as landowners and the appellee, E. Dean Carlson, Secretary of Transportation of the State of Kansas, will be referred to as KDOT.

This case arises in connection with events leading up to the construction by KDOT of the South By-Pass project in Ford County, Kansas. The South By-Pass project consisted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lindner v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gutierrez v. County of Zapata, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  3. Eastex Wildlife Conservation Ass'n v. JASPER, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Moore v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. A & H Corp. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Tibert v. City of MintoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. All New Gutter Service, Inc. v. DusekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. In Re Bd-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API