Lindner v. Hill
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, Justice,
This cause concerns the implied dedication of a road to public use. In 1982, Harvey Lindner and his wife brought this action against the Kendall County Attorney (Frank Y. Hill, Jr.) and others seeking a declaratory judgment that the road in question is private. The trial court, sitting without a jury, held that the road had been impliedly dedicated to public use. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 673 S.W.2d 611. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
In 1889, Herman Lindner, Harvey Lind-ner’s grandfather and predecessor in title, built a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Las Vegas Pecan & Cattle Co. v. Zavala CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Lindner v. Hill, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Greer v. Department of Liquor ControlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by100 opinions
- Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Scott v. Cannon, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Barstow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Scown v. Neie, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
- Gutierrez v. County of Zapata, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.