Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'n
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
1 .GUIDRY, J.
Arlen B. Cenac, Jr. (Cenac), Public Access Water Rights Association, et al. (PAWRA) and Melva Cressionie each separately appeal from the trial court’s judgment. Appellant, Cenac, appeals that portion of the trial court’s judgment declaring the canal in question to be burdened by a servitude of use in favor of the public at large by virtue of implied dedication as recognized by Louisiana law. Appellant, PAWRA and appellant, Melva Cressionie, appeal the portion of the trial court’s judgment granting a permanent injunction barring them from launching, parking or otherwise using the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Torres v. FalgoustSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. New Orleans Term. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bomar v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003