Legal Opinion

Hennly v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1994No. S93G1813; S93G1841PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunt, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals to decide whether Richardson’s claims are barred under the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) and whether Richardson fails to meet the definition of “handicapped individual” under the Georgia Equal Employment for the Handicapped Code (GEEHC). We answer both questions in the affirmative and reverse.

In 1987, Jim Hennly, the vice president of First Federal Savings and Loan Association (First Federal) and a pipe smoker, began working in an office close to the desk of Bonnie Richardson, a receptionist/ switchboard operator at First…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  2. Murphy v. Ara Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Salt Lake City Corp. v. ConferUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Garrett v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ray Bell Construction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Chaparral Boats, Inc. v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. FRETT v. STATE FARM EMPLOYEE WORKERS' COMPENSATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  4. Potts v. UAP-GA. AG. CHEM., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Farrell v. Time Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API