Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Ara Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 30, 1982No. 64293PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Judge.
For the purpose of this appeal from the grant of defendantappellee’s motion for summary judgment, the following facts are not in dispute:
Appellee ARA Services, Inc. (“ARA”) operates a cafeteria at Klopman Mills, providing food services for employees of the mill. Jack Meffert was the supervisor of ARA’s business at all times pertinent to the present action and was acting within the scope of his employment with ARA. In January, 1980 appellant Linda Murphy was hired by Meffert for employment in ARA’s Klopman Mills cafeteria. Meffert remained appellant’s supervisor until she was fired…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Echols v. Chattooga Mercantile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Helton v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- General Fire & Casualty Co. v. BellflowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- EMPLOYERS INSURANCE CO. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Cox v. BrazoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Bright v. NimmoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Smith v. Animal Urgent Care, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- SCI Liquidating Corp. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Hennly v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.