Hilliard v. Bennett
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
This mandamus proceeding challenges the authority of a trial court sua sponte to sanction an attorney who has filed and then non-suited an action that was assigned to the respondent’s court. We hold the respondent lost jurisdiction over the cause before the motion for sanctions was filed, and thus the order sanctioning relators is void. We conditionally grant a writ of mandamus.
The respondent is Max Bennett, Judge of the 319th District Court of Nueces County. Relators, Robert C. Hilliard and Andrew Schirrmeister, III, are Texas attorneys representing multiple plaintiffs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. MillardTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Greenberg v. BrookshireTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Kutch v. Del Mar College, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Jobe v. Lapidus, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Zimmerman v. Ottis, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Robbins Chevrolet Co. v. Motor Vehicle Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.