BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Millard
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HIGHTOWER, Justice.
In this original proceeding, Relator BHP Petroleum Company, Inc. (BHP) seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to grant its motion for nonsuit and dismiss the entire proceeding including ANR Pipeline Company, Inc.’s counterclaim. We deny the writ of mandamus.
BHP is a producer and seller of natural gas. ANR Pipeline Company, Inc. (ANR), the real party in interest, is engaged in the purchasing, transporting and selling of natural gas. BHP and ANR entered into a gas purchase contract in 1984; however, due to market conditions ANR requested relief from some of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEX. v. Oxy USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Greenberg v. BrookshireTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Turner v. PruittTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Heritage Life Insurance Co. v. Heritage Group Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by337 opinions
- Texas Municipal Power Agency v. Public Utility Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon Ex Rel. ShultzTexas Supreme Court · 2006
332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.