Legal Opinion

BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Millard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1991No. C-9504PublishedCited by 337 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HIGHTOWER, Justice.

In this original proceeding, Relator BHP Petroleum Company, Inc. (BHP) seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to grant its motion for nonsuit and dismiss the entire proceeding including ANR Pipeline Company, Inc.’s counterclaim. We deny the writ of mandamus.

BHP is a producer and seller of natural gas. ANR Pipeline Company, Inc. (ANR), the real party in interest, is engaged in the purchasing, transporting and selling of natural gas. BHP and ANR entered into a gas purchase contract in 1984; however, due to market conditions ANR requested relief from some of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEX. v. Oxy USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Greenberg v. BrookshireTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Turner v. PruittTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Heritage Life Insurance Co. v. Heritage Group Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by337 opinions

  1. Texas Municipal Power Agency v. Public Utility Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon Ex Rel. ShultzTexas Supreme Court · 2006

332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API