Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. Ottis
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided December 12, 1996No. 13-96-477-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YÁÑEZ, Justice.
William F. Zimmerman, III, brings the present mandamus proceeding, complaidng that the trial court improperly transferred to another county his lawsdt against Frito-Lay Corporation, the real party in interest, after Zimmerman nonsdted all of Ms claims. We grant mandamus relief.
On January 22, 1996, Zimmerman filed a wrongful discharge lawsdt against Frito-Lay in the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas. Frito-Lay then filed a February 29, 1996, motion to transfer venue to Collin County, Texas, or alternately to Fort Bend County, Texas, on the ground that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- The State Bar of Texas v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Rivercenter Associates v. RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United Oil & Minerals, Inc. v. Costilla Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- in Re Valliance Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- In Re Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Kemper v. Stonegate Manor Apartments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- In Re Frost National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.