Legal Opinion
Porter v. Fulgham
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 9, 2009No. Civil Action 04-1440 (RBW)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Melvin Porter brings this action against his employer, the United States Agency for International Development (“Agency”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-3(a), 16(a) (2000) (“Title VII”), alleging that the Agency engaged in discriminatory employment practices against him based upon his race and gender, as well as retaliatory employment practices based on his participation in protected activity, i.e., his 2001 lawsuit against the defendant for illegal employment practices under Title VII and…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Porter v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Turner v. NicholsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Sledge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Drewrey v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.