Legal Opinion

Fox v. Abrams

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1985No. B002553PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Martin L. Abrams, individually (Abrams), and Martin L. Abrams, a law corporation (appellant), appeal from a judgment in favor of respondents Harry D. Fox, James Gibson, E. Clarke Moseley and Fox & Gibson, a law corporation. These consolidated actions arise from the bitter breakup of the parties’ law practice.

In 1976 the parties were practicing law together in El Monte as Abrams, Fox, Gibson & O’Rourke, a law corporation (AFGO). The shareholders had a written agreement referred to at trial as the “Buy-Sell Agreement. ”

Relations between the parties broke down, and on May 6,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. City of Morgan Hill v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Kelly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. LaFond v. SweeneySupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  5. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API