Papaioanu v. Commissioners of Rehoboth
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Short, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiff seeks specific performance of an option to renew concessionaire’s licenses to beach sections 1 and 3 of the City of Rehoboth granted pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance 101 of that city. This is the decision after final hearing.
Ordinance 101 of the City of Rehoboth provides rules and regulations “for fees to be paid by persons, firms and corporations engaged *558within the City in furnishing or servicing beach equipment.” Section two of the ordinance provides that The Commissioners of Rehoboth shall advertise and receive sealed bids from persons desiring to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frank v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1943
- Willoughby v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Cleveland Concession Co. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Goldman v. Beach Front Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Cleveland Concession Co. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
- Papaioanu v. Commissioners of RehobothCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Marta v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995