Legal Opinion
Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided July 24, 1992No. 4:90cv264PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PAUL N. BROWN, District Judge.
The above entitled and numbered cause was called for trial before the Court without a jury on January 20, 1992, in the United States Courthouse in Sherman, Texas, and the Court having heard all the testimony and considered all admissible evidence, as well as the argument of counsel and their proposed findings and conclusions, hereby enters its findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the patent licensing issues in this case in conformity with Fed.R.Civ.P. 52. Any finding of fact which constitutes a conclusion of law…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Positive Software v. New Century MortgageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1994
- Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
- Murray v. Franke-Misal Technologies Group, LLC (In Re Supernatural Foods, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2001
- Intel Corp. v. Broadcom Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.