Legal Opinion

Cleveland Concession Co. v. Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1948No. 20845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

As we construe the pleadings in this appeal on questions of law and fact, they do not present only questions of law for determination by the court.

The petition is so drawn, that the court cannot know what the operative parts of the contract between appellant and appellees are.

The answer, although admitting certain allegations of appellant’s petition, specifically denies certain portions thereof, and generally denies .its averments not admitted.

There are thus created issuable facts, or direct issues, upon material propositions — particularly, performance by appellant — which would…

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biggs v. Bernard, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Papaioanu v. Commissioners of RehobothCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  3. Balduf, Exr. v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Papaioanu v. Commissioners of RehobothCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API