Legal Opinion

Papaioanu v. Commissioners of Rehoboth

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 18, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

186 A.2d 745 (1962)

Nicholas PAPAIOANU, Plaintiff,

v.

The COMMISSIONERS OF REHOBOTH, a Delaware Municipal corporation, Defendant.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, Sussex County.

December 18, 1962.

Houston Wilson, Georgetown, for plaintiff.

Paul R. Reed, Georgetown, for defendant.

SHORT, Vice Chancellor.

Plaintiff seeks specific performance of an option to renew concessionaire's licenses to beach sections 1 and 3 of the City of Rehoboth granted pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance 101 of that city. This is the decision after final hearing.

Ordinance 101 of the City of Rehoboth provides rules and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1943
  2. Willoughby v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cleveland Concession Co. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Goldman v. Beach Front Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Cleveland Concession Co. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. Rutledge & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  2. Klaassen v. Allegro Development Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
  4. Marta v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  5. TRU Creditor Litigation Trust v. RaetherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API