Legal Opinion
In Re Sumitomo Copper Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 2000No. 96 Civ. 4584(MP)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
Credit Lyonnais, S.A. (“CL”) and Credit Lyonnais Rouse (“CLR”) (collectively referred to as the “Credit Lyonnais Defendants”) each move, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss the Sixth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) against them for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to allege fraud with sufficient particularity.
Background
In the Complaint, plaintiffs assert claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sumitomo Copper Litigation v. Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re Sumitomo Copper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In Re Sumitomo Copper Litigation ClassCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Calabrese v. CSC Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.